Guccifer 2.0 files were copied locally, not hacked, destroying the Russian hacking narrative.
A new study1 which analyzes the file metadata attributed to the Guccifer 2.0 person, has concluded that the DNC files were copied locally and not over the internet.
The analysis is extremely detailed and makes many findings, but perhaps the most significant is conclusion 7, in particular the final sentence:
"Conclusion 7. A transfer rate of 23 MB/s is estimated for this initial file collection operation. This transfer rate can be achieved when files are copied over a LAN, but this rate is too fast to support the hypothesis that the DNC data was initially copied over the Internet (esp. to Romania). This transfer rate can also be achieved when copying directly from a computer’s hard drive to a fairly slow USB flash drive; there is a lot variability in USB flash drive speeds. We can shorten this statement and say that the 23 MB/s transfer rate supports the conclusion that the files were initially copied locally and not over the Internet."
Put simply, the transfer rate for the DNC files was too quick to have taken place over the internet. This destroys the fake narrative that the Guccifer 2.0 files were obtained by a Russian or Romanian hacker. To be fair, only gullible weak-minded leftists ever believed these claims, but the meta-analysis adds further evidence to what was already known by those who employ critical thought.
An overview of the study outlining a number of key findings can be found at the following link:
https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/
If the FBI investigation into the DNC server had any credibility, they would immediately investigate the conclusions from this study. In fact if the FBI investigation had any competence, they would have arrived at the same conclusions long ago themselves.
Of course, the FBI investigation was carried out under disgraced former FBI Director James Comey's watch, and the FBI have yet to even examine the DNC servers. Instead, the DNC hired 'Crowdstrike', a cybersecurity firm with little credibility2, to examine their servers, and the FBI simply accepted what Crowdstrike claimed! Crowdstrike have essentially acted as a PR firm for the DNC, and have since retracted many of the false claims from their initial report3, although this has not been reported by the corrupt leftist media. Crowdstrike have also refused to cooperate with the House Intelligence Committee, suggesting they have something to hide.
And yet, incredibly, the FBI accepted the claims of PR control firm Crowdstrike without examining the DNC's servers for themselves! This seems like an act of gross incompetence on the FBI's part, until you learn that James Comey has a history going back almost two decades of covering up for the Clintons' crimes.4
Comey is gone, but his failure to act with integrity when investigating, or rather not investigating, the DNC servers, needs to be added to the growing list of actions that Comey needs to be investigated for.5
#DrainTheSwamp #DNCLeaks
- - - - - - - - - -
An in depth analysis of the Guccifer 2.0 controversy, explaining how the claims that Guccifer 2.0 hacked the DNC's servers were debunked and discredited, can be found at the link below:
http://g-2.space
- - - - - - - - - -
Links:
1 https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/
2 http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-23/credibility-cyber-firm-claimed-russia-hacked-dnc-comes-under-serious-question
3 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4376628/New-questions-claim-Russia-hacked-election.html
4 http://investmentresearchdynamics.com/james-comey-has-been-covering-up-the-clintons-messes-for-decades/
5 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/10/comey-memos-reportedly-had-classified-info-trump-says-that-is-so-illegal.html
 |
| The DNC files were copied locally, destroying the 'Russian hacker' narrative. |
"Conclusion 7. A transfer rate of 23 MB/s is estimated for this initial file collection operation. This transfer rate can be achieved when files are copied over a LAN, but this rate is too fast to support the hypothesis that the DNC data was initially copied over the Internet (esp. to Romania). This transfer rate can also be achieved when copying directly from a computer’s hard drive to a fairly slow USB flash drive; there is a lot variability in USB flash drive speeds. We can shorten this statement and say that the 23 MB/s transfer rate supports the conclusion that the files were initially copied locally and not over the Internet."
Put simply, the transfer rate for the DNC files was too quick to have taken place over the internet. This destroys the fake narrative that the Guccifer 2.0 files were obtained by a Russian or Romanian hacker. To be fair, only gullible weak-minded leftists ever believed these claims, but the meta-analysis adds further evidence to what was already known by those who employ critical thought.
An overview of the study outlining a number of key findings can be found at the following link:
https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/
If the FBI investigation into the DNC server had any credibility, they would immediately investigate the conclusions from this study. In fact if the FBI investigation had any competence, they would have arrived at the same conclusions long ago themselves.
Of course, the FBI investigation was carried out under disgraced former FBI Director James Comey's watch, and the FBI have yet to even examine the DNC servers. Instead, the DNC hired 'Crowdstrike', a cybersecurity firm with little credibility2, to examine their servers, and the FBI simply accepted what Crowdstrike claimed! Crowdstrike have essentially acted as a PR firm for the DNC, and have since retracted many of the false claims from their initial report3, although this has not been reported by the corrupt leftist media. Crowdstrike have also refused to cooperate with the House Intelligence Committee, suggesting they have something to hide.
And yet, incredibly, the FBI accepted the claims of PR control firm Crowdstrike without examining the DNC's servers for themselves! This seems like an act of gross incompetence on the FBI's part, until you learn that James Comey has a history going back almost two decades of covering up for the Clintons' crimes.4
Comey is gone, but his failure to act with integrity when investigating, or rather not investigating, the DNC servers, needs to be added to the growing list of actions that Comey needs to be investigated for.5
#DrainTheSwamp #DNCLeaks
- - - - - - - - - -
An in depth analysis of the Guccifer 2.0 controversy, explaining how the claims that Guccifer 2.0 hacked the DNC's servers were debunked and discredited, can be found at the link below:
http://g-2.space
- - - - - - - - - -
Links:
1 https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/
2 http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-23/credibility-cyber-firm-claimed-russia-hacked-dnc-comes-under-serious-question
3 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4376628/New-questions-claim-Russia-hacked-election.html
4 http://investmentresearchdynamics.com/james-comey-has-been-covering-up-the-clintons-messes-for-decades/
5 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/10/comey-memos-reportedly-had-classified-info-trump-says-that-is-so-illegal.html
No comments:
Post a Comment